Sollicitatievragen bij Elsevier

The first interview was with Line Manager, Second interview with Regional Sales VP. After that I was ivited to HQ in Amsterdam to make a business related presentation and have 2 more interviews with Solutions and Marketing VPs. Overall process was quiet easy going and very candidate-centric. I've enjoyed that experience.

Phone interview with the manager and person I was replacing. Questions were mainly of a technical nature. I was honest about not knowing some of the software. The manager was impressed by this.

I was impressed with HR teams efforts to make me feel involved in the process and their collaborative approach. However, my experience with the hiring manager was quite different. The hiring manager, displayed a lack of professionalism by yawning multiple times (more than 10 in a 45 min interview) while I was providing answers and sharing my perspectives on various topics. This behavior is highly disrespectful and unprofessional, especially during a first interaction. Furthermore, I was deeply disappointed with the feedback I received from the hiring manager (someone who has less certifications and focus on project management field). I am happy to receive at least a "feedback" but the feedback not only failed to accurately reflect my experience and qualifications, but it also did not align with their own job description. It was quite apparent that the hiring manager did not take the time to thoroughly review my CV, but rather just captured a few keywords during interview and used them in her feedback.

It's well and good. Got to know about the details of project. Also I stated about my relevant experience and skill sets. They have explained the work life balance in Relx

The interview was friendly and inviting. There was a short email task, which included looking at graphs and deciphering information based on that. This was challenging for someone not already in a similar job role but nowhere near impossible

The questions were way too in-depth for a first interview. Asked me to describe projects but then also told me alternatives to how i could have done my projects which was quite strange.

The process was long. With holidays and everything it took almost 3 months. There were a total of 3 interviews and a final presentation. But they were very transparent and coordinated throughout the process,.

it went well first round was a shl online test . shortlisted ones were moved to the tech round. Then they were called for hr round where they asked all the hr questions

The interview process consisted of 3 rounds. First I got a phone call from the recruiter, followed by interview by the hiring manager, followed by interview by hiring manager and executive Publisher and finally interviewed by the Vice President of STEM.

lots of behavioral questions, asked simple technical question regarding finding closest palindrome given a date formatted as year month day. Behavioral questions included why Elsevier, tell us about an instance, etc.