Sollicitatievragen bij World Wildlife Fund

The interview process was good. It was taken in a nice environment. Taken by three faculties. Good questions were asked. Conceptual interview. 1 hour long. 2 days time given for result.+

30-minute interview questions regarding interest in the position and why I would be a good candidate. First they asked to know a bit more about myself and interests, followed by a set of icebreakers and questions regarding the position.

The interview was conducted by the HR and the line manager. Both are friendly and nice during the whole process. So firstly it was self introduction, then the interviewers asked more details about the resume, after that came to the QA session. But seems they prefer a candidate that can work full-time for at least six months and whose first language is English.

Took a while but the interview was enjoyable. Informal chat followed by preprepared questions. There was also a task to prepare for. There was a tour of the facility followed by a chat with HR.

Sehr anspruchsvolle Aufgabe als Grundlage des Gespräches, unfreundliches Verhältnis, kein Feedback nach der Ablehnung. Für die Zeit, die ich in der Aufgabe investieren musste, fand ich das Verhältnis nicht fair.

The interview process for this Assistant Accountant Role was a 30-minute interview process with a panel of about five people drawn from various departments with WWF. the meeting was a bit disorganised they wanted to change my time at the last minute

Responsabile selezione davvero disponibile, colloquio amichevole e sereno, è stato davvero un piacere conoscerle. Mi hanno spiegato nel dettaglio la posizione, e si sono rese disponibili per eventuali chiarimenti. Molto tempestiva la responsabile nelle risposte, grande educazione.

There was first a written assignment, online mode. Based on that you will be short listed for three rounds of interview. All conducted online and about ten to fifteen minutes

Applied online, 3 weeks later I got an invitation to their Woking office (no recruiter/HR called before that). I was offered a few time slots to choose from, all on the same day. There was a task in the email: make a presentation about the ideal future strategy of supporter experience and how to have a strong voice within WWF. I did the presentation in person for a panel of 3 managers/dept.heads (no HR), in a relaxed atmosphere, although it felt they were not very experienced interviewers (read all questions word by word from a paper). They seemingly liked my ideas and recommendations, took a lot of notes and then they moved to competency-based questions, but many of those could not really be expected from what was included in the job description. After almost 2 hours I was let go and I have never heard from them again (this was 2 months ago). Their only email came from a no-reply address, so I could not even follow-up. I think it is very unprofessional to ghost candidates who prepared for their presentations for days, took a day off work and travelled to the WWF office.

It is a group interview. First, you will have self-intro session. The interviewee will ask you some questions. For example, what do you know about WWF, your expectations, etc. In the end, you will have around 45 mins written test.