Reviews van Playrix

4,4

87% zou aanbevelen aan een kennis

(18 reviews in totaal)

86% positieve zakelijke vooruitzichten

Playrix heeft een werknemersbeoordeling van 4,4 van 5 sterren, op basis van 18 bedrijfsreviews op Glassdoor. De meeste werknemers hebben het hier dus uitstekend naar hun zin. De werknemersbeoordeling van Playrix is in lijn met het gemiddelde (binnen een standaardafwijking van 1) voor werkgevers in de bedrijfstak IT (3,9 sterren).

Reviews per functie

18 reviews
5,0
31 mei 2026

Modern stack, no legacy nightmares

Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

– Modern infrastructure, no critical legacy hacks – Small senior team, decisions move fast – Minimal bureaucracy, no approval chains for routine changes – Flexible hours, fully remote – Good summer corporate event last year – Work fully complies with the labor code

Minpunten

– On-call rotation eats into evenings sometimes

5,0
26 mei 2026
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Coming from a smaller studio, I was honestly worried the codebase here would be a tangled mess given how long the games have been live. It's not. The gameplay code is layered properly, naming conventions are consistent across modules, and there's actual documentation for the systems that matter. Code reviews are one of the better parts of the job for me. People take them seriously, leave detailed comments, push back where it makes sense, but nobody is gatekeeping or playing the senior card to win arguments. I've had reviews with the lead engineer turn into 30-minute discussions about architecture choices and walked away with a better understanding of the system every time. Salary is genuinely competitive for the region, payments come through on the same day every month without fail. The flexible schedule is real, I usually start around 11 and nobody has ever made a comment about it. What matters is whether the sprint commitments get delivered. Tooling is modern, the build pipeline works, and the engineering organization is large enough that there's always someone who has solved the problem you're stuck on.

Minpunten

Crunch periods are a real thing before major feature releases, especially when something LiveOps-related is on a fixed external date. They don't become the default mode and they're usually predictable a few weeks out, but I'd be lying if I said the last two weeks before a big release feel the same as a normal sprint.

4,0
25 mei 2026
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

The role is set up as a deliberate step toward game design or production. Day-to-day work is manual testing of new features on iOS, Android, macOS and UWP, plus regression cycles. Bug reports here go beyond ""found, repro steps"". You're expected to dig into root cause and product impact. Proposals on mechanics and UX in team discussions actually get heard. Flexible schedule, remote setup, salary in line with the market.

Minpunten

Pace picks up around release cycles, regression windows can be intense and you need to replan the week when priorities shift. Communication between teams isn't always perfectly synced, sometimes context on a feature reaches QA later than would be ideal. AI tools are increasingly part of the workflow, keeping up with new approaches takes its own time on top of regular tasks.

Weergave: 1 - 3 van 18 reviews

Glassdoor heeft 385 reviews over Playrix die anoniem zijn geplaatst door werknemers van Playrix. Lees reviews en beoordelingen van werknemers op Glassdoor om te beslissen of Playrix bij je past.