Management dishonest, hire and fire culture - werkgeversreview Engineer bij Crypto.com

1,0
21 feb 2023
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Flexible working style, can work from home

Minpunten

-Management lacks transparency. They're not open and treat employees are just treated as a number. -Management has lack of foresight. In mid 2022 they hired lots of people, only to lay them off 1 month later. You would think they would have learnt but they repeated the same thing towards the end of 2022, hiring numerous people only to lay them off soon after. -Ceo is dishonest, lies about layoff figures.1st round of layoff is not 5% but closer to 40%. the latest round of layoff is mentioned as 20% but is probably closer to 50%. Also paints a good picture internally but proceeds to lay people off suddenly with no tact, just an email from HR to personal acct and people realizing they got locked out. -The salary is pretty poor, considering that the bonus and rsu vest in small amount in the 1st year. A lot of people did not manage to get bonus or rsu either since they got laid off. -Would not recommend anyone to work here as management has a total lack of regard for employees. Its really sad that a lot of capable people got burnt, rejecting good offers and leaving their comfy tech jobs only to get laid off due to poor & inconsiderate decision making. -The company spends a lot on marketing. Sadly, similar to its marketing, it tries to look expensive outside but lacks the quality to back it up internally.

Ontdek andere reviews over Crypto.com

5,0
29 jan 2026
Anonieme werknemer
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

they have a lot of jobs

Minpunten

they are one of the best

2,0
19 mrt 2026
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Work From Home Decent Salary

Minpunten

In a compliance role, leadership should be willing to listen when analysts/associates raise concerns about regulatory risk, process weaknesses, or policy gaps. In my experience, that was not the culture here. Too often, valid concerns were dismissed instead of taken seriously, even when they involved issues that could affect the firm from a compliance and control perspective. What made the experience especially frustrating was the leadership style within parts of compliance. Rather than encouraging open dialogue, managers came across as defensive, dismissive, and more focused on protecting their own authority than addressing the substance of the issue and creating a toxic environment where raising concerns did not feel safe or productive. Instead of approaching issues in a professional and solution-oriented way, interactions could become personal, degrading, and hostile. This became even more concerning when the NAM compliance department later failed several items in an internal audit, including areas that had already been flagged by analysts as process or policy gaps. That, to me, reflected a broader problem: important concerns were being raised internally, but not handled with the seriousness or humility they required. There was also very little transparency or accountability when it came to employee development, feedback, or career progression. Communication with subordinates was poor, and employees were not given meaningful support or clarity around growth opportunities. HR was equally disappointing. From my perspective, there did not appear to be a reliable or well-structured path for employees to raise concerns and expect a fair resolution. Overall, my experience was that parts of the compliance culture operated more like an insular power structure than a healthy control function. For a company in a heavily regulated space, that is a serious leadership and culture problem.

2
Bekijk reviews op: Nuttig|Beoordeling|Datum|Alle