Reputation doesn't match work experience for many employees. - werkgeversreview Manager bij Duke Health

2,0
23 okt 2008
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

The reputation of Duke carries alot of weight with outsiders, including vendors and/or possible collaborators. Benefits are better than most, including accrued time off, but this is offset by the generally lower-than-industry base pay and limited, if any, merit bonus opportunities. If you're looking for a place to punch in and then punch out after 8 hours, this is the place for you.

Minpunten

Power still resides with doctors. Hierarchy is very evident with top-down decision-making/communication. Little continuing education/development unless required for re-certification. Alot of "good old boy" networking. Low pay with single digit yearly salary increases. Little differentation between raise percentages based on performance; ie., exceeds performance raise percentage may be less than a 1% different than "meets" performance. Depending on when you are hired, you may not be eligible for a raise for over a year. When negotiating your compensation package, many of the benefits are non-negotiable; ie., time off is set based on years of service and cannot be modified.

Ontdek andere reviews over Duke Health

5,0
16 jun 2026
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Scheduling is quite flexible working 3 12s

Minpunten

Holiday pay is only for major holidays not Christmas Eve

1,0
23 jun 2026
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

The work is meaningful and the team consists of some highly skilled professionals who are dedicated to supporting patients, providers, and the organization. The role provides exposure to complex issues and opportunities for professional growth.

Minpunten

The department suffers from significant leadership and culture challenges. Employees are hired as experienced professionals but are given little autonomy to perform the work they were hired to do. Leadership frequently inserts itself into routine matters, creating unnecessary delays and fostering a culture of micromanagement rather than trust. Communication is inconsistent and often lacks accountability. Important decisions and changes are frequently communicated verbally without written follow-up, creating confusion and shifting expectations. Employees are expected to remember evolving guidance, identify leadership mistakes, and compensate for communication failures. There is a noticeable gap between leadership messaging and employee experience. Work-life balance, employee engagement, and professional respect are regularly discussed, but many employees do not experience those values in practice. Concerns raised by employees do not appear to result in meaningful change, contributing to low morale and diminished trust in leadership. Leadership often responds to issues by implementing department-wide restrictions rather than addressing the specific individuals or situations involved. As a result, high-performing employees are subjected to increasing oversight and reduced autonomy because leadership is unwilling to address performance concerns directly. Turnover, employee dissatisfaction, and leadership credibility have been ongoing concerns. The department would benefit from leaders who are willing to listen, communicate transparently, accept accountability, and trust the expertise of the professionals they supervise.

Bekijk reviews op: Nuttig|Beoordeling|Datum|Alle