Great mission and product—poor leadership, planning and trust across the board. - werkgeversreview Marketing bij Handshake

2,0
19 okt 2023
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

There are some really great talent at the company along with a strong mission and fantastic product and ecosystem.

Minpunten

Leadership doesn't really know what they're doing in terms of growth, revenue and how to plan for the future. The constant changes in narratives, goals and scaling makes it really hard to work in this environment. There's also a strong lack of trust across teams and things are always very political when it comes to division of work and ownership. Roadmap planning for most teams are also nonexistent—they expect you to execute and plan within the same quarter with close to little to no resources and support from cross-functional teams.

avatar
Reactie van Handshake
2y
Thank you for taking the time to share your thoughts. We recognize that there has been a lot of change at Handshake over the last year, and we know that it can be hard to work amidst so much change. We are aiming to have more stability in 2024 to enable our teams to focus on their work and their goals, which we also hope will allow for better roadmapping across our teams.

Ontdek andere reviews over Handshake

5,0
24 jun 2026
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Remote opportunities for different projects.

Minpunten

Projects often pause, and we wish they would last longer.

1,0
22 mei 2026
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Challenging, interesting position in the short term.

Minpunten

The company has implemented a new timer policy that has “active” and “inactive” time on the backend that makes up for the total time. We were getting paid by total time (as you should), but HAI has changed it to only pay contributors for the time marked “active.” Time is “active” when scrolling, typing, and clicking within the specific task tab. Time is “inactive” when none of the previous actions are happening; i.e., when reading the task without moving the mouse or pressing keys, researching in another tab, etc. It sounds like they have changed the rules to only pay for active time, which has caused huge pay discrepancies. The percentage of inactive time is usually way more than active time on these timers due to the amount of reading, visual analyzing, thinking, and research required for some tasks. This behavior is unacceptable because time that seems “inactive” is still important to the quality and completion of tasks. They keep throwing accusations like “time thieves” around to justify it. If you respect yourself, pack it up and go somewhere else. I know most people who work at these places are desperate for income, but that’s exactly what they’re hoping for. They’re hoping you will be desperate enough to be taken advantage of.

Bekijk reviews op: Nuttig|Beoordeling|Datum|Alle