The Decline of IRC - werkgeversreview Anonieme werknemer bij International Rescue Committee

2,0
23 jan 2017
Anonieme werknemer
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

You will meet the smartest and eloquent staff and leaders in the forefront of refugee resettlement and conflict resolution. The field staff are very committed and their passion is unquestionable. Even just talking to them gives you a certain kind of awe. You will have a humbling experience interacting with them as you learn about the lengths that they go to deliver aide and other resources to the most vulnerable people in the world.

Minpunten

While you will meet the most competent and passionate people especially field staff, you will also encounter the ugly face of corporate America - its greed, selfishness, and uncaring face in the IRC headquarters. It is really quite ironic being that it is a charitable organization that's supposed to show compassion and care. Now more than ever, because of the dire political climate imposed by the Trump administration, IRC leadership should have taken more action in saving the organization especially the lowest paid employees. Instead, they are ready to downsize almost without care, even if the senior officers all make 6 digit salary. If you look at the IRC's financial records, open to the public via the website and IRS or even Wikipedia, you will know that the CEO makes $600k - that's more than the salary of the US President. This alone, makes me so shameful and frustrated with the organization. There is always talks of budget cuts and it is quite tangible, but it never seemed to be an option for management to take a budget cut themselves for the good of the company. I think that's why IRC is on the decline because while it is still a prestigious organization, its resources are not efficiently allocated. There are more consultants hired than lower to mid-entry staff who "actually does the work", the very limited training funds are mostly allocated for the management (so bizarre - train the leaders but no program for staff), perhaps only 5% is allocated to staff. regretfully, there is no career growth in IRC unless you start in a senior position. Silo mentality is also a huge problem. There is no synergy between departments and is almost always fighting for resources instead of coming up with a joint resolution. Leaders only listen to other leaders, undermining the confidence and competence of staff. Currently, 1 or 2 people quit every month in the HQ.

Ontdek andere reviews over International Rescue Committee

5,0
24 mei 2026
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Very valuable insights in conducting work. Provides valuable input.

Minpunten

None that I can think of.

2,0
22 apr 2026
Anonieme werknemer
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

You will meet some amazing and passionate people here who are truly there for the mission. Many came to this country as refugees and immigrants themselves and continue to devote their lives to helping others going through similar experiences. If you end up on the right team, it's an extremely rewarding job.

Minpunten

Unfortunately, the HQ upper management makes it a toxic place to work. VPs regularly undercut each other publicly (including at all-team meetings and gossiping negatively with staff), especially when potential job cuts were on the horizon. C-Suite didn't listen to staff concerns about upper management and didn't investigate major departures by dedicated staff who left due to poor management despite their dedication to the mission. Leaders picked favorites, ignoring work performance (excusing mediocre performance in some, having high standards for others), and preferred yes-men over staff who wanted to think more critically about the work. Projects were pushed too quickly, despite concerns that it could be detrimental to clients. Positions given to unqualified internal staff who wouldn't be interviewed for the role as external candidates. Senior leaders (director and above) are more focused on keeping their jobs than the mission and will use lower staff work for their own career growth/safety. DEI didn't seem to apply for senior leader roles, where there was little, if any, diversity.

4
Bekijk reviews op: Nuttig|Beoordeling|Datum|Alle