Senior Monitoring and Evaluation Officer - werkgeversreview Senior Monitoring and Evaluation Officer bij International Rescue Committee

4,0
23 jul 2018
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

 Data analysis, interpretation and presentation  Data quality audit  Opened Data Kits (ODK/KOBO) data collection tools design and system management  Problem and Solution Tree analysis  Situation Research and Program Evaluation  Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)Plan design  Design of Indicators at every result level  Project Logical Model and Framework design  Results framework design  Data collection tools design, both quantitative and qualitative.  Facilitation skill on training of project staff on data quality and data tools  Training of project staff responsible for data collection on the usage of various data collection tools and other M&E approaches  Training of various project staff on Data quality standard  Establishment of baseline for project indicators through baseline survey  Good Teamwork spirit  Computer information system management

Minpunten

Staff capacity building is

Ontdek andere reviews over International Rescue Committee

5,0
25 dec 2025
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Everyone is so nice here.

Minpunten

we have a lot of time to collaborate one project

2,0
22 apr 2026
Anonieme werknemer
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

You will meet some amazing and passionate people here who are truly there for the mission. Many came to this country as refugees and immigrants themselves and continue to devote their lives to helping others going through similar experiences. If you end up on the right team, it's an extremely rewarding job.

Minpunten

Unfortunately, the HQ upper management makes it a toxic place to work. VPs regularly undercut each other publicly (including at all-team meetings and gossiping negatively with staff), especially when potential job cuts were on the horizon. C-Suite didn't listen to staff concerns about upper management and didn't investigate major departures by dedicated staff who left due to poor management despite their dedication to the mission. Leaders picked favorites, ignoring work performance (excusing mediocre performance in some, having high standards for others), and preferred yes-men over staff who wanted to think more critically about the work. Projects were pushed too quickly, despite concerns that it could be detrimental to clients. Positions given to unqualified internal staff who wouldn't be interviewed for the role as external candidates. Senior leaders (director and above) are more focused on keeping their jobs than the mission and will use lower staff work for their own career growth/safety. DEI didn't seem to apply for senior leader roles, where there was little, if any, diversity.

4
Bekijk reviews op: Nuttig|Beoordeling|Datum|Alle