Ask about our Burnout - werkgeversreview Anonieme werknemer bij International Rescue Committee

2,0
4 mei 2023
Anonieme werknemer
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Resettlement work is fulfilling, being able to help a person/ family start over in a new country is amazing and that is what keeps most of the employees.

Minpunten

BURNOUT- This happens easily because the case loads are unrealistic. The number of enrollments matter more than the quality of work. You have to be able to hit the ground running even while never being properly trained. PAY- even with it being a nonprofit agency the pay is comical. Staff are carrying unrealistic caseloads and required to drive through all of DFW for $21 per hour. Days are filled with driving families all over and staff often times ends up paying for things out of pocket. They gave us $1 raises! LEADERSHIP- Dallas in particular has problem with lazy leadership that places bandaids on everything until they can’t. OVERALL- the Dallas office is a clique. If you’re in then you’re good, if not then you’re over looked. They do not value current staff and love to hire from the outside.

Ontdek andere reviews over International Rescue Committee

5,0
24 mei 2026
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Very valuable insights in conducting work. Provides valuable input.

Minpunten

None that I can think of.

2,0
22 apr 2026
Anonieme werknemer
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

You will meet some amazing and passionate people here who are truly there for the mission. Many came to this country as refugees and immigrants themselves and continue to devote their lives to helping others going through similar experiences. If you end up on the right team, it's an extremely rewarding job.

Minpunten

Unfortunately, the HQ upper management makes it a toxic place to work. VPs regularly undercut each other publicly (including at all-team meetings and gossiping negatively with staff), especially when potential job cuts were on the horizon. C-Suite didn't listen to staff concerns about upper management and didn't investigate major departures by dedicated staff who left due to poor management despite their dedication to the mission. Leaders picked favorites, ignoring work performance (excusing mediocre performance in some, having high standards for others), and preferred yes-men over staff who wanted to think more critically about the work. Projects were pushed too quickly, despite concerns that it could be detrimental to clients. Positions given to unqualified internal staff who wouldn't be interviewed for the role as external candidates. Senior leaders (director and above) are more focused on keeping their jobs than the mission and will use lower staff work for their own career growth/safety. DEI didn't seem to apply for senior leader roles, where there was little, if any, diversity.

4
Bekijk reviews op: Nuttig|Beoordeling|Datum|Alle