Good Company To Work For - werkgeversreview Integration Test Engineer bij Leidos

4,0
10 okt 2013
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Job security is good as long as the government holds together. Paid time off is fair.

Minpunten

Raises aren't great. Reviews seem to conform to the "laddering" standard which rates you against others, which is not a good way of assigning ratings. Benefits are generally good, but took a dive due to "uncertainty of healthcare reform." Basically Obamacare scared SAIC (now Leidos) into cutting our health insurance and raising prices.

Ontdek andere reviews over Leidos

5,0
2 jun 2026
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Incredibly welcoming and tight knit community. Everyone works as a team and there is a sense of togetherness. Known schedule for the year including vacation and off days. Rewarding work.

Minpunten

Flight Service is a 24/7 operation and like all aviation careers, your schedule is based on seniority. The longer you’re with the company the better your schedule becomes but this likely means late or overnight shifts and working holidays.

3,0
27 mei 2026
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Leidos provides opportunities to work on complex government programs with meaningful technical challenges. Depending on the contract and team, there can be exposure to cloud infrastructure, cybersecurity, systems engineering, networking, and mission-focused work that is difficult to find elsewhere. The company also has a large footprint, so there may be internal opportunities for people who are able to navigate the organization.

Minpunten

My experience was that the quality of management varied significantly by program. Communication around expectations, roles, and priorities was often inconsistent, and decisions that affected employees were not always explained clearly or handled in a transparent way. Work-life balance also depended heavily on local management. Flexibility that existed in practice could be changed quickly, and employees were sometimes left trying to reconcile changing expectations with existing workloads and personal obligations. In my view, the company would benefit from stronger oversight of program-level management decisions, especially where employee responsibilities, workplace flexibility, and performance feedback are concerned. I also found that technical decision-making was sometimes driven more by schedule pressure than by sound engineering judgment. On complex government programs, that can create unnecessary risk and frustration for employees who are trying to do things correctly.

Bekijk reviews op: Nuttig|Beoordeling|Datum|Alle