A a lot of interesting scientific and engineering work opportunities but very political and insular top leadership. - werkgeversreview Senior Finance Analyst bij Leidos

3,0
18 jan 2014
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Great people in the line organizations, family oriented, very educated and professional people, good pay, encourage work-life balance, invest in training and education. Literally some of the finest people you will ever meet work in this company.

Minpunten

Benefits are steadily eroding, bonuses are slowly being redirected to top tier managers, especially executives, strategy is focused on cutting cost, no meaningful research being done despite immense operating cash and cash balances, executive management fixated on looking like main competitors to impress investors, requiring huge culture changes and a top down mentality, so constant reorganizations occur that kill strategic momentum (and some careers) and cost a lot of money. Literally hundreds of layoffs of good people in favor of outsourced business solutions or shared services - part of a predominating trend in the industry of accepting the 80% solution for business operations, leaving executives happy but leaving professionals and employees frustrated and accepting of failure.

Ontdek andere reviews over Leidos

5,0
7 mei 2026
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Large companies. Willingness to work with you.

Minpunten

Low paying. No hybrid opportunity

3,0
27 mei 2026
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Leidos provides opportunities to work on complex government programs with meaningful technical challenges. Depending on the contract and team, there can be exposure to cloud infrastructure, cybersecurity, systems engineering, networking, and mission-focused work that is difficult to find elsewhere. The company also has a large footprint, so there may be internal opportunities for people who are able to navigate the organization.

Minpunten

My experience was that the quality of management varied significantly by program. Communication around expectations, roles, and priorities was often inconsistent, and decisions that affected employees were not always explained clearly or handled in a transparent way. Work-life balance also depended heavily on local management. Flexibility that existed in practice could be changed quickly, and employees were sometimes left trying to reconcile changing expectations with existing workloads and personal obligations. In my view, the company would benefit from stronger oversight of program-level management decisions, especially where employee responsibilities, workplace flexibility, and performance feedback are concerned. I also found that technical decision-making was sometimes driven more by schedule pressure than by sound engineering judgment. On complex government programs, that can create unnecessary risk and frustration for employees who are trying to do things correctly.

Bekijk reviews op: Nuttig|Beoordeling|Datum|Alle