You can do much better then this place... - werkgeversreview Anonieme werknemer bij Lessen

1,0
15 jun 2024
Anonieme werknemer
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

The problem space is challenging with extremely high operational headwinds.

Minpunten

If you're even remotely considering joining Lessen, PLEASE READ THIS FIRST. I urge you to reconsider and run in the opposite direction as fast as you can. This company is an absolute train wreck, and getting involved with them is essentially signing up for a one-way ticket to utter bewilderment. First and foremost, let's talk about the so-called "leadership" at Lessen. The CEO is the epitome of cluelessness. This person couldn't lead a successful team even if their life depended on it. Their complete lack of vision and ability to steer the company in a coherent direction is nothing short of astonishing. The CEO spends more time making empty promises and spewing corporate jargon than actually addressing the real issues facing the company. It's no wonder the entire organization is in shambles. They're more interested in attending fancy conferences and posing for photo ops than understanding the intricacies of their own business. (See their LinkedIn, it’s all they have.) (See the Google reviews of their corporate office as the truth is there.) Speaking of business practices, Lessen should be called out for what it truly is—a company built on deceit and unethical behavior. They have mastered the art of cheating their vendors. Cut corners and deliver subpar service—that seems to be their motto. Their contracts are filled with hidden clauses designed to screw over any service provider naive enough to sign on the dotted line. Honesty and integrity are foreign concepts here. If you value your time, money, and sanity, steer clear of any dealings with Lessen. As if the incompetent leadership and unethical practices weren't bad enough, the internal culture at Lessen is absolutely toxic. The product team operates as a boys' club, where cronyism and favoritism run rampant. It's a disgusting fraternity atmosphere where only those who schmooze with the right clique make it ahead. Don't even think about voicing a different opinion or, heaven forbid, being a woman trying to break in—you're in for a rude awakening. Meritocracy is a joke here; it's all about who you know and how well you can play the political game. People working here are overworked, undervalued, and micromanaged to death. Employee turnover is through the roof, and for good reason. They have conducted no less than 5 rounds of layoffs since late 2022. The company's approach to work-life balance is to eliminate the "life" part altogether. The only thing you'll gain from working at Lessen is stress, demoralization, and a deep resentment for wasted potential. If you decide to join Lessen after reading this, you are either extremely desperate (ask yourself why), or you don’t care about your career at all.

Ontdek andere reviews over Lessen

5,0
4 aug 2025
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Continued education and product knowledge. Remote work available

Minpunten

OT only offered on holiday work days

1,0
19 mei 2026
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Employees have strong potential and are capable of delivering quality work when supported by effective leadership and clearer project direction. But unfortunately, leadership is not effective and helpful here which I’ve described below.

Minpunten

The Agile process needs significant improvement. Collaboration between onshore and offshore QA teams can become challenging, especially when reported issues are frequently dismissed or invalidated without proper investigation. This creates an environment where team members may feel discouraged from raising legitimate concerns. On-shore QAs become “UAT Testers” as a result. Management involvement during demos can also feel counterproductive at times. Instead of proactively identifying and mitigating project risks earlier in the process (but they are not even involved in early discussions) , concerns are sometimes raised publicly during demos, which creates unnecessary pressure rather than constructive collaboration. There is also a noticeable emphasis on release timelines over overall testing confidence and product quality. In situations where testing risks are raised, they don’t receive sufficient consideration if release goals are prioritized. When issues occur after release, accountability tends to fall heavily on QA teams despite broader project and process factors contributing to the outcome. QA documentation standards did not always appear to be applied consistently across all levels of the organization. Some leadership-level QA contributors were able to provide minimal to no testing documentation while expecting more rigorous standards from other team members. Lastly, the recurring fear of layoffs created a culture where some employees felt pressured to prioritize visibility and management approval over open communication and constructive collaboration.

1
Bekijk reviews op: Nuttig|Beoordeling|Datum|Alle