Destruction of an enterprise - werkgeversreview Senior Technical Manager bij Netcracker Technology

3,0
6 mei 2024
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Nothing really improved in Netcracker's culture since past 5 years. If an honest retrospective is to be drawn, there will be more negative than once could think off. It had had the very strategic and tactical positioning since 2018-2019, considering huge pipeline for cloud native journey that was taking off for telecommunication landscape. In lieu with migration of legacy BSS/OSS to cloud, automation, data analytics and utilization of comprehensive machine learning model that was a golden opportunity. Unfortunately the train was missed or due to lack of anticipation, thought process this organization is appearing now a very mediocre, amateur product organization. It’s hard to see such downfall. It’s sad to believe even.

Minpunten

Concerning points 1. The current leadership does not have the ability to think in a futuristic way. There are only (only 2~3 max) people who could possibly think well ahead of time – what as a product line we should do, how we should solve (& monetize) our customer’s problem, how we could grow our own lieutenants by unleashing their true potential and enabling them in/with new technology platform. Nothing implicitly or explicitly expressed so far from those community. 2. Not so efficient director and senior managers – most of them are non-technical. Not a single attribute can be vouched for in them like: Technology and/or BSS /OSS Domain/Business analysis and/or, process, where they can truly contribute to delivery, or enable the team. They only know how to forward a thread by looping others (sometime that also found to be wrong). It’s unbelievable that how a product company with such tremendous legacy (enriched product line, RBM) could have afforded this? Or sometimes it appears to be deliberate to finish the enterprise? 3. The most unfortunate symptom that this organization is carrying even after 12 years of buying Convergys in 2012-13. This is with respect to “holding critical decision” by CIS/Russian community. It HAS been proven every time that decision making responsibility, ability to leading a higher position is not something ever be extended to Indian Community or to be more precise it will never be extended to those who were acquired from Convergys in 2012-13, regardless of their deep product knowledge, sharp technical prowess, uncompromising delivery contribution, effective client liaison (someone has to remember that without any CIS presence 100’s of implementations went from conceptualization – to – Cut-over at ease). It’s finally the TRUST factor and a sense of RESPECT that Indian community never got since the acquisition of Convergys by Netcracker or even for the others who were not part of old Convergys as well. 4. Fostering a very TOXIC ambiance by encouraging many un-professional actions (you name it and it exists fortunately): wrong promotions to few folks (while there were more deserving candidates) consistently, recruiting regularly in-efficient candidates (even knowingly they would be a complete miss-fit the fathom of complexity for which the recruitment is being done) and safe-guarding again them despite not able to lead a phase or project or both, deliberately keeping the experienced members sidelined & highlighting few stream of people who can always say “YES”, sticking always to some pathetic framework and not able to come out from that “emotion”, Overlooking the faults to fellow CIS despite several unbelieving miss from their leadership and then to finally reaching out to non-CIS person (who was never given free hand, authority, support) to help rescuing from the complex situation.

Ontdek andere reviews over Netcracker Technology

5,0
17 okt 2024
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

good team, good management, interesting projects

Minpunten

sometimes too many business trips

4,0
8 dec 2025
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Some historical context to start with. NetCracker was built by some of the brightest graduates of its time. It used to be an extremely successful scale-up because of a combination of two factors: 1. The right moment and place: a wealthy and fast-growing telco industry needed a fresh start in their systems to roll out the infrastructure the world is using today. 2. A business model based on consultancy-style principles: hire talented graduates and unsettled perfectionists, pay them pennies, work them to death, and make a reasonable margin because of that. It worked really well. And then they lost it all due to classic leadership failures and star syndrome. Key reasons to choose NetCracker: You will meet some of the most brilliant people here and make friends for life. You will learn how to make impossible things possible, and you will learn rigorous delivery frameworks executed at a level very few companies and people in the world can match. You will also learn team-based brainstorming of subtle and bold political maneuvering. And many other advanced skills you will probably never need anywhere else. This company truly values outcomes and those who can deliver. Their survival depends on execution, so high achievers have always been valued and quickly promoted. However...

Minpunten

Number one bad thing you need to know (beyond working unreasonable hours for decades and learning non-transferable skills): There is a caste system. If you are 'delivery', you will never be admitted into the higher caste of western office decision makers, nor will you ever be equally paid. They will work you to death, promote you into even more impossible missions, but will never consider you at the same level, despite you owning the entire delivery process (revenue generation!) and managing teams of hundreds of people. NC operate in a highly chaotic and politically heavy environments of impossible transformation programs. They frequently commit to delivering programs that cannot be delivered, so they burn their high achievers to exhaustion and then praise a caste of politically savvy, non-tech 'managers' whose main role is not delivery but navigating the heavy corporate games of dinosaur-like or inertias telcos without any measurable outcomes. NC charge clients for software implementation, they pay you like you are doing some leisure product development, but in reality, company and tech teams at the forefront are driving painful full-scale transformations for which western-world consultants would charge $ thousands per hour. Ever heard of leadership skills? Forget about it. The entire leadership vertical has none, and no intention to develop any. (On the senior management level think of micromanagement, lack of EQ, team dysfunctions, lack of transparency, favoritism and all other toxic traits of poor leadership). Heard of things like QBRs, strategy planning, OKRs, etc.? Non-existent. Real program management or portfolio management? Non-existent. The entire workforce outside of Boston is treated like a body shop. No transparency of the company strategy. It’s both: there is no comprehensive strategy planning in place and a 'none of your business' attitude. The so-called department managers also have zero general management skills. No understanding of how to direct, plan, or execute strategy. And 90% of them don’t possess even basic people-management skills.

Bekijk reviews op: Nuttig|Beoordeling|Datum|Alle