Blind upper management - werkgeversreview Service Desk Analyst bij Node4

1,0
2 okt 2022
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

- Fancy coffee machines -Nice offices - for the most part, left to get on with things

Minpunten

The company are not interested in any kind of negative feedback, staff turnover is high, some departments have lost nearly all of their staff, and management doesn't seem bothered at all. Solutions that are implemented for customers do not work correctly, and feedback is ignored both during and then after implementation. You will be constantly spammed by Yammer updates about Node4 winning "Great place to work awards" or results of the "Wellbeing survey" where negative feedback is ignored completely or briefly glossed over, or have to attend the same ESSAS training for the 3rd time. The MD of the company says they've seen the glassdoor reviews but "doesn't put much stock in them" which is an interesting choice considering its unfiltered feedback about Node4. Overall Node4 has the vibe of a company pretending they have a culture you see in US-based companies like Google where everybody loves it with an almost cult-like passion but in reality, it's got more of a sinking ship feel to it.

Ontdek andere reviews over Node4

5,0
17 jul 2023
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Node4 is very fast and learn more easily.

Minpunten

But I didn't earn more money.

1,0
20 feb 2026
Anonieme werknemer
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Some of the people are nice, but most have left or been removed

Minpunten

Node4 presents itself as a modern IT services provider, but internally it still operates with a legacy data centre mindset. While the market moves rapidly towards AI, automation and outcome-based services, the company’s commercial thinking feels stuck in the past. Acquisitions were meant to modernise the business. In practice, integration is weak. Newly acquired capabilities are absorbed into an unchanged operating model instead of reshaping it. Rather than building a coherent, future-focused portfolio, the same legacy approach is applied across everything. Specialist and consultative services are treated like commoditised infrastructure. Differentiation is diluted. When growth expectations are missed, the response is restructuring rather than confronting the underlying strategy. Roles are cut, teams reduced, and knowledge leaves — but little fundamentally changes. Culturally, influence is uneven. Long-standing relationships with the founder carry weight, informal networks matter, and accountability is inconsistent. For those outside established circles, driving change or challenging entrenched thinking can feel futile. Externally, the language is transformation and growth. Internally, resistance to change is strong. The result is slow decisions, fragmented accountability and limited agility. There are capable people in the business, but without real structural change, the company risks remaining a legacy provider wearing a modern badge. Prospective employees and customers should approach with clear eyes.

1
Bekijk reviews op: Nuttig|Beoordeling|Datum|Alle