Started out great, then Gary Friedman came back. - werkgeversreview Distribution Center Supervisor bij RH

1,0
2 okt 2016
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

The point system was great and really forgiving to associates who had demanding lives outside of work. Not everyone abused it but a few people did. Got treated to meals and fun raffles every so often to boost morale. Management was AWESOME and Carlos Albarini seemed to have a solid plan for the future of the RH brand. Under him as CEO things moved fluidly and almost effortlessly. Then.... in 2014 Carlos stepped down and Gary Friedman came back. Everything from here forward is a con.

Minpunten

As soon as Gary came back he did his trademark special move: spreading the company thin with too many projects. Then when something fails the company is too bled dry to do much about it. The quality of the products getting to the customer becomes worse and worse leading to the company reworking their already crap returns policy from a trickling faucet to a gaping open wound just bleeding money out of the company. So now that the company is losing money on their crappy products who's fault is it? Corporate? Nope (yes). The vendors? Nope (yes). The associates who have nothing to do with it? Yes (no). So they take all the incentives away from the associates, because they obviously need punished for stuff they can't control. Points? Gone. Raffles? Gone. Meals? Gone? Morale? All time low. I left and ran to the hills and joined the already mass exodus from that company. Do NOT work here.

Ontdek andere reviews over RH

5,0
2 mei 2026
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Experience working for on of the leading innovators in the design industry.

Minpunten

The scheduling department being in a regular call center and not the gallery

2,0
25 jun 2026
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Trauma bonding with your team.

Minpunten

Leadership has no pulse on reality. They put business need and dictator-like decision making in front of work/life balance and what’s right. Instead of using the plethora of experience on their teams to help create and execute fair and equitable solutions to grow the culture and business, alike; they force positional changes, demand that serving staff supplement the income of other support positions and refuse to uphold any of the values and foundations the culture is allegedly built around.

Bekijk reviews op: Nuttig|Beoordeling|Datum|Alle