Trainee Position Review - werkgeversreview Underwriting Trainee bij Selective Insurance

5,0
30 mrt 2020
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

The trainee position allows you to collaborate with employees who work in all departments of the company. Being at the corporate during the rotation weeks allow trainees to experience what those do in departments such as Flood, Legal, IT, Actuarial, Marketing, our line of businesses, and our business service units. The first few weeks are full of insurance training (coverage week) where trainees are taught the various fundamentals of insurance. The trainees represent many areas of the company and it is great that we are able to build relationships with our co-workers in such a collaborative environment. There is plenty of room for growth in such a great company.

Minpunten

Our trainees come from various locations among the country and there is a fair share of travel involved during the trainee program. The first two months all trainees are in Branchville, NJ. The trainees then return back to Branchville for one week out of each month for corporate rotations and other training. It does seem that the travel to/from Branchville can become overwhelming for those who have to fly in if they have families or children at home.

avatar
Reactie van Selective Insurance
6y
Thanks for the feedback about your trainee program experiences! It sounds like it's been a good start for you, and we appreciate the note about travel requirements. We'll let the program administrator know.

Ontdek andere reviews over Selective Insurance

5,0
17 apr 2026
Anonieme werknemer
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Strong but difficult leadership during transformation.

Minpunten

Relocation causing some some concern

2
1,0
26 mei 2026
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Decent benefits and decent coworkers

Minpunten

Working at Selective was a toxic work environment shaped by favoritism, excessive workload expectations, and poor boundaries around employee availability. Management often applied expectations unevenly, which created a lack of fairness and accountability. High performance did not always seem to be the primary factor in decision-making, which undermined trust in leadership. There was also a strong “big fish, small pond” dynamic, where internal status and informal influence often carried more weight than actual performance or collaboration. This contributed to a highly political environment where trust between colleagues was limited and information did not always feel safe to share openly. Employees were expected to be available far beyond normal working hours, creating an unsustainable “always on” culture with no real work-life balance. The workload was consistently too high for the compensation provided. Internal politics further interfered with day-to-day work and made collaboration more difficult than it needed to be. In practice, this environment often encouraged self-preservation over teamwork, which made it difficult to build trust or rely on others consistently. Overall, the environment was not structured in a way that supported long-term employee wellbeing or retention. This is not a workplace that supports a healthy work-life balance. For me, the experience felt unsustainable, and over time it became clear that the environment was not conducive to long-term growth or wellbeing.

2
Bekijk reviews op: Nuttig|Beoordeling|Datum|Alle