Pay was decent. - werkgeversreview Account Executive bij Veeam Software

2,0
8 mei 2026
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Had a great direct manager.

Minpunten

Director/Regional leadership was subpar. One in particular was continuously condescending to reps.

avatar
Reactie van Veeam Software
3w
Thank you for highlighting your positive experience with your direct manager — we're glad to hear that. We appreciate your feedback and are grateful for your review. We'd also like to respond to the concerns you've raised. We appreciate your feedback about the Director and Regional leadership. We understand that strong leadership at every level is crucial for our success, and we are committed to addressing any gaps. We encourage open communication and value your input as it helps us improve and adapt our leadership strategies. Your insights are vital as we work to create an environment that fosters collaboration and empowers our Veeam team. Thank you for the time you spent with us. We wish you all the best in your future career.

Ontdek andere reviews over Veeam Software

5,0
4 jun 2026
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Great work life balance. Working with some of the smartest people I've ever worked with.

Minpunten

Growing pains of acquiring more companies.

2,0
3 feb 2026
Anonieme werknemer
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Pay is good as well as benefits.

Minpunten

Poor organizational structure and lack of clarity: Roles, responsibilities, and reporting lines were confusing. This made collaboration and accountability very difficult. Nepotism and favoritism in leadership: Upper management heavily favored hiring and promoting people from their previous companies the "buddy system". Loyalty to personal networks appeared to matter more than competence or performance, which created cliques and made nonconnected employees feel like outsiders. Hypocritical company culture: Leadership frequently talked about "employee matters" values, strong culture, and employee well being, but in practice these were not reflected in actions. Layoffs, heavy workloads after staff reductions, and a focus on looking good on paper undermined any real trust. Frequent layoffs and job insecurity: Multiple rounds of layoffs created constant uncertainty. Remaining employees were expected to absorb significantly more work with fewer resources and little recognition or support. Heavy favoritism toward offshoring and lower cost international employees: Upper management strongly preferred hiring or retaining talent in countries with significantly lower cost of living because their lower salaries made departmental budgets and headcount metrics look better on paper. This resulted in U.S. based employees being disproportionately targeted in layoffs or overlooked for retention/promotion.

7
Bekijk reviews op: Nuttig|Beoordeling|Datum|Alle