15 apr 2018
Anonieme werknemer
Reactie van Wonder Research
7yHey! Thanks for taking the time to share your experience with us. I'd like to say plainly that review should never be a personality contest. All work that goes through the Wonder Knowledge Assembly Line should be graded for its merit, not based on researchers' associations with a reviewer.
That principle is exactly what guided us to form a double-blind review process that ensures anonymity and objective review. Our goal with review is to capitalize on the years of expertise and talents of our most experienced analysts, while providing real, actionable feedback to the researcher as they grow in the Wonder Community.
If you feel that your experience didn't live up to those standards then I urge you to reach out to me at research@askwonder.com so we can rectify the situation.
To your other point, analysts with 4.8 and above are considered to be our highest performers, but this is not a threshold that determines your status in the community. As long as your work keeps up with the Wonder Quality Standards you are always welcome to "earn and learn" with us!