Pluspunten
The product is great, and the mission in K-12 education is meaningful, and there are some truly talented and hardworking people across all teams. Many colleagues are supportive and care deeply about the work.
Minpunten
Unfortunately, the positives are overshadowed by poor leadership and questionable decision-making. The company has a track record of letting go of quota-hitting employees without clear justification, which creates a constant sense of instability and lack of trust. It’s hard to stay motivated when strong performers aren’t valued or protected. Leadership often lacks the backbone to advocate for their teams, especially when it comes to decisions driven by upper management. There’s a noticeable disconnect between leadership and frontline employees, and it frequently feels like employees don’t have anyone in their corner. Another concern is the tendency to overlook strong internal talent in favor of external hires. Great employees who understand the product and culture are passed over, which hurts morale and continuity. The sales organization, in particular, suffers from ineffective leadership. Direction can feel superficial and uninspired, and there’s a lack of meaningful strategy or support. At times, it feels like guidance is reduced to generic motivational phrases rather than actionable leadership. Compensation is also below market compared to other K-12 ed tech companies. Be sure to read the fine print in the commission policy—payouts may not align with expectations, which can be frustrating after putting in the work to close deals. On top of that, there are excessive internal meetings that often feel unnecessary and could easily be reduced to a weekly cadence. This takes away valuable time from actually doing the job.