Ik heb persoonlijk gesolliciteerd. Ik heb gesolliciteerd bij TP in okt 2025
Sollicitatiegesprek
It started with an initial interview where they asked about my background. After that, I was scheduled for a second interview, which was more detailed and focused on my skills and how I handle certain situations at work. The interviewer also explained more about the company and the position. Everyone I spoke with was respectful and professional, which made the process less stressful. Overall, the interview process was smooth, well-organized, and gave me a good impression of the company.
Sollicitatievragen [1]
Vraag 1
The interviewer asked me if there was ever a time I was late for work and what my reason was.
3 Telefonate und 2 Test.
Die Mitarbeiterin hat mir vorher gesagt welche Fragen(nicht alle aber 2/3) sie stellen wird und mir geraten mich darauf vorzubereiten.
Das habe ich dann natürlich auch gemacht und das hat mir sehr geholfen.
Quick and only a few questions and not too hard. It was all basic customer service questions and a short role play and email writing in both languages. Total time was less than an hour.
It was all automated without any human involved where the first one was an online assessment - that's OK saving both recruiter and candidates' time.
Here comes the incompetent part - after the assessment submission, recruiter sent out a mass automated rejection email WITHOUT candidate's name and reason of this failed assessment. The copy and paste format was very obvious because the background has a contrast color tone.
"Dear Candidates,
Thank you for your time and interest in the position with Teleperformance Malaysia.
We regret to inform you that based on your recent assessment results XXX, you did not meet the required criteria to proceed further at this stage."
Please, having a courtesy to at least addressing the candidate's name and one liner explaining which part failed wouldn't take up too much of your precious time.
THANK YOU for your rejection. I wouldn't want to work for an established organization with such poor practice, because candidate experience is employer branding time and you failed it.