Sales is the Exception to Work Life Balance at Amazon - werkgeversreview Account Manager bij Amazon Web Services

5,0
2 apr 2026
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Amazing work Life balance. Like anywhere else, this is going to depend a lot on your manager in the territory that you receive. However, I’ve noticed that in the Austin office, working 30 to 40 hour weeks is the standard and I don’t know anyone who works over 40 hours a week on a consistent basis. Obviously, if there’s a certain big deal, you’re trying to push over the edge you might need to every once in a while, but for the most part, there’s a ton of flexibility on the time that we come into the office and leave.

Minpunten

A lot of people are leaving right now because the compensation structure is not always super clear and usually we are given our quotas after the quarter is actually over. Also, there is no continuity with customers. You may work on any given relationship with a customer for one to two years and then right before you get a deal to close, they move that customer out of your territory. Also, there is no path to increasing your level. In other parts of the company, it is very typical to move from a four to a five in two years. In the sales order, it takes 4 to 6 years of AWS experience. Even if you have prior sales experience. For this reason, a lot of people try to boomerang because it seems like that’s the only way to promote.

Ontdek andere reviews over Amazon Web Services

5,0
26 mei 2026
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Good place to learn Nice relocation benefits

Minpunten

You build your own path

4,0
12 mei 2026
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Operated in systems that had real scale, operational constraints, and production consequences.

Minpunten

Working at Amazon Web Services gave me strong exposure to distributed systems, operational ownership, and production-scale infrastructure, but there were definitely tradeoffs as well. One downside was that, like many large organizations, ownership could become fragmented. You often own a subsystem or workflow rather than an entire product end-to-end, which can limit exposure to broader architectural decision-making unless you deliberately seek it out. There was also significant process overhead. Design reviews, operational processes, dependency coordination, and organizational alignment were valuable for learning rigor, but they can slow iteration compared to smaller engineering teams. Another challenge is that large internal ecosystems can abstract away infrastructure complexity. AWS has extensive internal tooling, deployment systems, and operational platforms, which are powerful, but some of that experience does not transfer directly outside the company. I also found that operational work could dominate engineering time at points. Handling production issues, retries, integration failures, and on-call responsibilities teaches reliability engineering well, but it can reduce the amount of time spent on deeper technical exploration or greenfield development. Finally, there is the perception aspect. AWS is a strong name, but experienced interviewers know there is wide variance between teams and roles. The company name opens doors, but ultimately you still need to demonstrate technical depth, ownership, and strong engineering judgment independently of the brand.

Bekijk reviews op: Nuttig|Beoordeling|Datum|Alle