Testing with Infosys can be testing - werkgeversreview Testing QA bij Infosys

2,0
5 feb 2010
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Great facilities, including good cafetaria, sports facilities and state of the art office spaces. Well defined support systems and workplace policies.

Minpunten

This may be an experience due to my specific team and hopefully, does not allow to the organization as a whole. The management was oblivious to the demands made on our time by the projects they would take up. We were mostly understaffed on our projects and the work almost always required more than 8 hours of effort, with weekends thrown in fairly often. The formal attire made no sense in a coding job, nor did the condescending management.

Ontdek andere reviews over Infosys

5,0
4 jun 2026
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Great salary, great people. LEX internal library is great.

Minpunten

Can not think of any cons.

4,0
10 jun 2026
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Job stability – Infosys is known for long-term employment and steady projects. Strong brand value – Having Infosys on your resume adds credibility and global recognition. Good learning opportunities – Access to internal learning platforms, certifications, and training programs (especially for freshers). Global exposure – Opportunities to work with international clients and global delivery teams. Structured processes – Well-defined policies, documentation, and governance. Work-life balance (project dependent) – Many teams offer reasonable working hours. Employee benefits – Health insurance, paid leaves, and wellness initiatives. Safe and inclusive workplace – Strong focus on ethics, compliance, and diversity.

Minpunten

Salary growth can be slow – Compensation increments may be lower compared to market standards. Limited flexibility in role changes – Internal mobility and project switches can take time. Bureaucratic processes – Decision-making can be slow due to multiple approval layers. Project allocation delays – Bench time and delayed onboarding to projects can happen. Variable learning exposure – Skill growth depends heavily on the project assigned. Less innovation in some teams – Certain projects may use legacy technologies. Onsite opportunities are limited – Compared to earlier years, onsite roles are fewer. Performance appraisal transparency – Rating systems may feel rigid or unclear.

Bekijk reviews op: Nuttig|Beoordeling|Datum|Alle