IBM India Bad Place to work - werkgeversreview Senior Software Engineer bij IBM

2,0
1 dec 2010
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

1> If you are allocated to good project, lot of opportunity to learn 2> Ready to spend money on trainings.

Minpunten

a> They did not gave me the role \ type of work for which I was interviewed, I came to know about it after joining, They do not even share if it is a support job\ Deevlopment (though its mostly decided at the begining), It comes to you as a surprise. (many my other friends have faced this) They would change your technology al together. b> Until my last day, no one knew who will be my replacement Manager did not even remember that some one is leaving that week.. (such g8 bonding !) Unless we initiate any thing, nothing happens c> Like Govt ppl, will have to slog a lot for getting things done, (starting from getting a machine, place to seat, at least in Govt thru money we can get the things done quickly, here you will have to have cool mind ) I remember, there was a wrong assignment of machines made against my name in the system, but I only had to keep requesting GDIT dept to get it removed. Initially they even advised me to find out physically where the wrongly assigned machine is located (from Lacs of computer!!) so that they can take some action d> Starting from your joining, you will have to swim across the net (W3) to get required information, what needs to be done just after induction day. e> Bad thing is you have 2 managers to be reported, and they may not have proper communication among themselves, We get confused, whom to report issue. No one would tell you at beginning the roles and responsibilities properly. Over all you do not get proper guidance from senior (managers) about how to respond on critical issues or any sort of problems.

Ontdek andere reviews over IBM

5,0
31 mrt 2026
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Very good team dynamic. A lot of exposure to various technologies.

Minpunten

A lot of internal metrics and record keeping.

4,0
26 aug 2014
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Disclaimer: A lot of what I'm writing below of course depends on the work area and management chain. But I found this to be fairly pervasive policies in IBM in my 9+ years with the company. 1. IBM's policies and management are very flexible when it comes to working remotely or accommodating various life situations (sick days, doctor visits, etc.). Management is encouraged to measure an employee by their work and impact, and not by hours spent at their office. 2. Great colleagues! Though unfortunately, many have been leaving due to the instability of IBM's HW development business. 3. At least in my area, there's a high level of flexibility on which projects should I undertake based on my and my management assessment of business impact.

Minpunten

1. Unfortunately, IBM still uses the "normal distribution" rating system, where at the end of the year each employee is ranked as a top contributor (5%), above average contributor (15%), average contributor (~75%), and bottom contributor (5%). This curve is difficult to apply in the R&D world, where you may have many members of the team working long and hard hours, and end up being "average contributors" at the end of the year, because there just isn't room for all to be top contributors. 2. The above may not be so disturbing, if only IBM didn't practically cancelled all raises, performance bonuses and incentive for the non top-performers. I've had a consistent "above average" rating in the last 4-5 years, and my raise and performance bonus were ridiculous mere 1.5-2% of my salary. Were I rated "average contributor" I would have gotten NOTHING. So you can imagine that people can go year after year without any raise to their salary. From talking to manager friend, this is IBM's way to eliminate the non-top-performers without having to fire them, as part of its direction of reducing US manpower. 3. Hiring freeze in many areas - again, as part of IBM's attempt to reduce its workforce across North America and Europe we see many jobs move to the India and Far East markets. This is of course upsetting to see local teams shrink and disappear, especially when many great local IBM colleagues and experts begin to drop out. From my experience thus far working with India SW teams - they are still very far away from the standards I would have expected from US and Europe based teams. 4. Poor top down communication about company's and divisions' future. Employees learn from rumors and news websites what's about to come...

636
avatar
Reactie van IBM
10y
Thanks for sharing your experience, and we're glad that you've had a positive experience working with talented colleagues and taking advantage of IBM's programs. IBM is in the midst of a major transformation, --our Systems business is going through its own changes to strengthen competitiveness. Change is never easy. As part of our transformation, we just launched a whole new approach for how we are coaching employees, delivering feedback and managing reviews. No distribution guidelines or what some think of as 'stacked rankings." What's particularly great is that this was co-designed with our employee base from all over the world... to the tune of hundreds of thousands of page views, comments, on-line debates and discussions. IBMers even named the new system Checkpoint, to reflect the regular feedback rituals we're adopting. Managers are more empowered with the new methodology to help them acknowledge the great work of their teams and help their employees develop professionally. These steps and more are showing up in our employee surveys as well. So IBMers are feeling the change. We are confident these changes will help us in continuing to attract and retain great talent.
Bekijk reviews op: Nuttig|Beoordeling|Datum|Alle